I. Mark
the items below true (T) or false (F) according to our class materials and
discussions.
1) _____Rather
than a freestanding statute, SB 1070 is an enactment that amended and created
new sections on immigration matters to the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS).
2) _____In
U.S. v. Arizona, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant’s intent to set its
own immigration policy and enforcement scheme makes SB 1070 invalid because the
federal government occupies the field on immigration.
3) _____Arizona
argues that SB 1070 cannot be preempted by federal law because Congress has
enacted legislation expressly encouraging cooperation from state and local
authorities in the enforcement of immigration laws.
4) _____Among
other enjoined provisions of SB1070 are ones criminalizing an alien’s failure
to complete or carry alien registration documentation and attempt to solicit
employment, in violation of federal immigration law.
5) _____SB1070,
Section 6, gives state police the authority to arrest an alien without warrant
when there is reasonable suspicion said alien has committed an offense that
makes him/her removable from the United States.
6) _____In
U.S. v. Arizona, the district judge ruled that SB 1070, Section 2(B), on
mandatory status verification, is certain to impermissibly burden
lawfully-present aliens and disrupt the federal immigration enforcement scheme.
7) _____In DHHS v. Florida, as argued before the
USSC, the petitioner characterizes the health insurance market as a unique one
where virtually everyone has transaction, whether they have used health care
services or not.
8) _____Central
to the respondents’ argument against the Obama health care reform is the unprecedented
step by Congress of mandating the purchase of health insurance by individuals
who have not used health care services or do not intend to use them in the near
term.
9) _____The
US argues that the minimum coverage provision compels individuals into commerce
but is a necessary and proper exercise of power by Congress under the Commerce
Clause because of the unique features of the health care market, such as the
cost-shifting that occurs as a result of the uncompensated costs caused by the
uninsured.
10) _____
The respondents argue that a proper means for Congress to achieve the goals of
the reform would be to impose guaranteed issue and community rating regulations
on insurers, or to subsidize health care through a tax.
II. Underline the best choices to complete the sentences below.
II. Underline the best choices to complete the sentences below.
·
(1 – 2) The US argues that the individual decision to COMPEL/FORGO
health insurance is one with a COMPREHENSIVE/SUBSTANTIAL impact on
commerce.
·
(3 – 4) An ALLOCATION/INFLUX of state requests
for status verification may IMPERMISSIBLY/LIKELY shift federal
immigration enforcement priorities.
·
(5 – 6) Congressional STATUTE/FINDINGS on the
matter were thought to JUSTIFY/IMPOSE the rules under
discussion.
·
(7 – 8) The states contend that the regulatory WEB/REVENUE
of the proposed scheme would not allow anyone to WITHDRAW/ESCAPE regulation.
·
(9 – 10) Insurance
cost is based on calculations of PREVENTIVE/ACTUARIAL risk, and the
states argue that the POOL/RATES of young, healthy
individuals without insurance could be covered at lower premiums.
·
(11 – 12) When deciding on a preliminary injunction, a
judge must find that the balance of EQUITIES/ BURDENS tips in the favor
of the moving party and that they are likely to suffer REASONABLE/ IRREPARABLE
harm.
·
(13 – 14) Section 2(B) frustrates the POLICY/CONCERN
of Congress for uniform rules PREEMPTING / GOVERNING the treatment
of aliens.
·
(15 – 16) The requirement is found to be in CONTRAVENTION/PROSECUTION
of a Supreme Court DIRECTIVE/LIKELIHOOD against subjecting aliens to police
surveillance.
·
(17 – 18) Section 5 makes it a MISDEMEANOR/DETENTION for
an unlawfully present alien to look for work, and Section 6 allows police to
arrest without a WARRANT/PRECEDENT.
·
(19 – 20) Those provisions may lead to the ENFORCEMENT/HARASSMENT
of legal residents who do not DETER/CARRY documentation.
III. Use
words from the box to fill in the blanks below.
severability
precedent
attrition
patchwork
intent
hearing
|
to enjoin
to place
to conflict
to deter
to
misconstrue
to move
to err
to vacate
to prevail
to hinder
|
proper
irreparable
inquisitorial
practicable
willful
void
|
wrongfully
knowingly
affirmatively
|
·
Arizona has asked the appeals court to (1)__________ the
injunction granted by the lower court judge, whom it charges with (2)__________
principles of law in reaching her decision.
·
The US seeks to have SB 1070 declared null and (3)__________
on the grounds that it (4)__________ with and is preempted by federal law; the
district court found that it is likely to (5)__________ on the merits.
·
While federal regulations bar unauthorized aliens from
(6)__________ applying for work, Congress has also (7)__________ expressed the (8)__________
not to criminalize such conduct. The
Supreme court has also determined that aliens not be subjected to (9)__________
practices.
·
Arizona wants to set a policy of (10)__________ through
enforcement in order to (11)__________ illegal immigration through SB 1070. The US sued and (12)__________ for a
preliminary injunction claiming, for example, that one provision may lead to (13)__________
arrests. The US also argues that the
Constitution does not allow for a (14)__________ of different immigration
policies in different states.
·
The US also argues that SB 1070 will (15)__________ the
federal government’s efforts to implement a uniform, well-balanced immigration
policy by (16)__________ a counterproductive burden on federal resources.
·
The judge says she applied (17)_________ legal
standards based on well established (18)__________ in deciding to (19)__________
SB 1070 provisions. She also held a (20)__________
where the parties presented their arguments.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário